I had inadequate idea about ‘Global Curriculum’. I did not know what to write about exactly. I did some research to learn on the internet. I got some information about topic and understood what ‘Global Curriculum’ is. Am I agree or disagree with ‘Global Curriculum’?. I do not know the answer to this yet. You can see the answer to this as you reading. So do I.
I want to mention what ‘Global Curriculum’ is. It is based on the goals of a long life and happiness. Currently, the common global curriculum is based on the historical policy goals of economic and military development. Students are treated as human capital. This global curriculum divides knowledge into separate courses taught in age-based classrooms. In contrast to this, human rights and environmental educators have adapted progressive methods.
I would like to compare old high school curriculum and global curriculum. Then, you can understand which one is better than the other.
In old high school cirriculum, main goal is to get a good job. There is rote learning, teaching to the test, “vertical” curriculum structure, multiple disconnected subjects, no holistic presentation, euro-centered history. Mechanistic paradigm is science and history. This is very specialized. In this cirriculum, values do not taught directly. There is no philosophy. There is conventional agriculture. Their students should be competitive person. There is multiple choice tests. Grammar is essential. There is a career guidance.
In global curriculum, developing self-learning changing agent is important. Holistic critical thinking is also important. Organic paradigm is science and history. There is “horizontal” core curriculum structure, single multidisciplinary narrat. Presentation is chronological and global. Its history of evolving east-west thought. This curriculum apply generalist, multidisciplinary core. Values taught directly. There is cooperative team learning. One of the most important things is ‘Essays’. This system’s goal is to develop writing skills and workshops. The other important thing is to learn how to be a change agent.
The purpose of education is to provide each member of society the capability to contribute to the collective goals, of that society where these goals are based around the accepted values of the community and that those goals and values are based on the historical and cultural wisdom of that community.
If we look at comparisons, we can understand which one is more useful. I think ‘Global Curriculum’ is more useful for students. It is certain clear from its features. Every country should apply this. Turkey also should apply this. Then, Turkey can be much more sophisticated country. I certainly support ‘Global Curriculum’ because of its useful features.AYŞE BALIN